Document Type : Review Paper
Authors
1 University of Technology, Electromechanical Eng. Dep
2 University of Technology, Elctromechanical Eng. Dep., Baghdad, Iraq,
3 University of Technology, Electromechanical Eng. Dep., Baghdad, Iraq,
Abstract
The choice of fuel in gas turbines impacts factors such as fuel economy, operating expenses, efficiency, emissions, and environmental sustainability. When comparing natural gas, oil, and diesel as fuels for gas turbines This comparison aims to provide insights into the key considerations associated with each fuel option and their implications for power generation. Natural gas stands out as a favourable choice due to its notable advantages. It offers improved fuel economy, resulting in cost savings and cheaper operating expenses compared to diesel and oil. The higher efficiency of natural gas combustion in gas turbines contributes to enhanced power generation capabilities. Moreover, natural gas emits fewer pollutants, including lower levels of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and greenhouse gases, making it a cleaner and more environmentally friendly option for power generation. However, the specialized handling and storage requirements of natural gas can limit its usage in certain applications, particularly in marine gas turbines where alternative fuel options may be more suitable. crude oil remains an affordable fuel in some regions, but its adverse environmental impacts, such as carbon emissions and pollution, make it less desirable from a sustainability standpoint. Gas turbines offer fuel flexibility, allowing them to utilize a range of liquid and gaseous fuels. This flexibility enables power plant operators to consider alternative options such as kerosene, naphtha, biofuels, and syngas, with appropriate adjustments to meet operational requirements and environmental regulations. understanding the effectiveness and outcomes of different fuel options in gas turbines is crucial for informed decision-making in power generation.
Keywords
', './data/ijogr/coversheet/cover_en.jpg'))